Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-5056929-20121202212603/@comment-4795804-20130101194746

Raindrop57 wrote:

Spike144 wrote:

Raindrop57 wrote: Added the month that the nominations are for (February 2013 Nominations section). Sorry if that didn't change the problem much. You didn't read or understand what I wrote about. How can you evaluate the activity of people in February 2013, when it is January 2013? I meant that these nominations were for who would be posted as user of the month in February. But now that it is mentioned, it is for their contributions in January. You said: "it is for their contributions in January". So which of the following paragraphs are about the contributions in January?

"AlthaBlade has done very good improvements to this wiki, as well as creating cool things, such as this page. He is also very active, and has put his user rights to good use. I think that AlthaBlade should be the first user of the month"

- What is written about the contributions in January here?

"Spike has worked very hard on the wiki for almost a year now and has done countless amounts of contributions. Formatting numerous pages, fixing up several Mediawiki pages, creating userboxes, helping out with the abuse filter, aiding in coutnering many spam/vandalistm incidents, creating and modifying templates. It is simply very hard to imagine this wiki without him. I therefore nominate for Spike144!"

- What is written about the contributions in January here?

"SW has made over 4000 edits and has been very active too. He has helped out with uploading daily challenge images as well as fixing spam, vandalism, and sorting out stuff. In addition, he is a friendly admin and communicates/collaborates with other users well. This is why I choose SW8573"

- What is written about the contributions in January here?

"SW is one of the 6 of my Bloons Buddies. He clears up spam and is VERY helpful. He has made almost 6,000 edits! I hope SW wins"

- What is written about the contributions in January here?