Thread:Spike144/@comment-5056929-20130101031525/@comment-5056929-20130102005352

I guess all of this is because the wiki hasn't really been very active in terms of editing articles recently so people are kinda looking back to all of the user's contributions instead of focusing on what the user has done on that particular month.

If we were to make it so that it is only about the user's contributions on that particular month, it would be very hard to nominate someone on the first few days of the month because barely anyone would've edited by then.

At the moment I have three solutions:

1. Make it more like the 'User of the Season' instead of the 'User of the Month', this will decrease the amount of featured users but will partially fix the whole 'no contribs within that month' problem.

2. Not allow admins to be voted upon at all. Besides, us admins have an unfair advantage to this.

3. Just simply make it so that we are talking about what the user has done previously as well as in the month that you want to user to be featured in even though it is called 'User of the Month'