User blog comment:Robot746/Wikis!/@comment-1785597-20120628033322/@comment-4316832-20120703062524

'''"But I HATE vandalism. The good editors and creator have spent time working on it. The hard work is deleted. How bad is that?

It is especially not nice for the people that don't know about it, so the block is worth it."'''

Everybody hates vandalism. I know the good editors and the founder spends a lot of time working on it, and which is ruined by a stupid edit, but you can go to the page's history and revert it. Recalling the experience I got from Zombie Farm Wiki, vandalism commonly occurs, but when I became an admin, and gave warnings, and not as long blocks, there were less vandalism and spam. If you don't give warnings, and long blocks, and so impatient, then there's a high chance of getting even more vandalism on the wiki. Take Zombie Farm Wiki for example, when Kgs88error was the major admin (as well as Notbryant, but he didn't block anybody), he constantly blocked people for minor reasons, like little vandalism or spam, and then they were huge problems of that on the wiki. He continuously blocked vandals, but the more he blocked, the more came. So I suggest don't do that on your wiki.