Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-5056929-20121202212603/@comment-121.79.199.85-20121203081139

Wow, I posted a large post and it didnt show up.

1) Thats rather accurate really, something that pains me. Why should anons be unable to qualify for things account owners can? Thats a minor level of Apartheid.

2) Yes. Actually, most people would and do shorten that to "121", name enough for me.

3) Thats really hurtful to know that, and slightly anger-inducing. Why should account owners be more "trustable" then anons? Why, I ask? Why?

By not having an account, I can still be recognized and do the jobs that a rollbacker, admin, or bureaucrat could, though probably not on the same level, AND I dont need to have a password and everything. There shouldnt be a need to make an account for the sole reason of recognition, or more access to things. Theres a category for pages that makes them uneditable by anons, and that is just sad that it even exists. Trust me, I have seen it before, on another wiki.