Thread:Qwertyxp2000 the second/@comment-26923519-20170807031545/@comment-3153244-20170810140534

JustLeafy, we did ask you to stop with those template changes and "new features" (Thread:84486 paragraphs 3 and 5, Thread:84486). If you have a suggestion, bring it to our attention instead of charging in blindly. You are not the only person on the wiki who knows how edit templates. I won't claim to know everything, because I don't, but Spike and myself have more experience than you in creating, editing and maintaining templates. More importantly, we preview and check our edits to ensure that we haven't broken anything (such as formatting).

You mentioned the following at w:Thread:1286848: While I did edit it (which was adding a tiny, but unnoticeable file, which is a line with the same color as the wiki's background), but how can you consider it as broken? It actually removes the disambiguation pages from the pages without images, which is a good thing. Plus, it'd take years for people to find out that a file exists in the template, so what do you think is so bad about it?

What do we think is so bad about it? It is these tiny changes (and band-aid solutions to problems), which you may think will accomplish "Goal A", when in fact it will have "unintended consequences B, C and D" that you aren't even aware of.

I don't have the time to hop onto the wiki every 5 seconds (nor do the other admins for that matter) and check every one of your edits to make sure you haven't made any drastic changes to wiki-wide templates without asking beforehand (examples: "modernized subcategories" from Pixel Gun Wiki, changing the colour scheme of Navboxes, breaking the disambiguation template).